How to make a complaint that actually works
Australia has a free ombudsman for almost every industry, and they are effective for one structural reason: they cost the business money and cost you nothing. This is the escalation ladder, the letter that works, and the ombudsman for each sector.
Short answer
Complain to the business first in writing and get a reference number, then escalate to the free industry ombudsman — AFCA for financial services, the TIO for telecommunications, the energy and water ombudsman in your state, or your state fair-trading agency. Ombudsman decisions bind the business but not you.
Australian complaint systems work far better than their reputation, and the reason is structural rather than cultural. External dispute resolution schemes are free to the consumer and charge the business a case fee whether they win or lose. A complaint that a company ignored for three months is frequently resolved within days of an ombudsman file being opened, because ignoring it has become the expensive option.
The catch is that almost every scheme requires you to have complained to the business first. Skipping that step gets your case bounced back, which costs weeks.
Step one: complain to the business, properly
Put it in writing, even if you also phone. Email creates a timestamped record that a phone call does not, and every subsequent step depends on being able to show what you asked for and when.
Structure it in four short parts: what happened, with dates and reference numbers; why it is a problem, referring to the relevant right if you know it; what you want, stated as a specific outcome; and by when. A deadline of ten business days is reasonable and gives you a clean escalation trigger.
Ask explicitly for a complaint reference number and for the matter to be treated as a formal complaint. Companies distinguish between 'enquiries' and 'complaints' internally, and only the latter is tracked and reported.
Keep it short and unemotional. A complaint that is three paragraphs with dates gets handled; one that is two pages of frustration gets skim-read. The person reading it did not cause the problem and has limited authority — your goal is to give them something easy to escalate.
Step two: find the right ombudsman
Financial services — banks, insurers, superannuation funds, lenders, brokers, financial advisers, buy-now-pay-later: the Australian Financial Complaints Authority, on 1800 931 678. It handles the great majority of money complaints, including scam disputes, insurance claim refusals and hardship refusals.
Telecommunications — mobile, landline, internet, billing, faults, contracts: the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman, on 1800 062 058.
Energy and water: the ombudsman in your state — EWON in New South Wales, EWOV in Victoria, EWOQ in Queensland, and equivalents in each other jurisdiction.
Retail goods and services, tradespeople, motor vehicles, and most other consumer purchases: your state or territory fair-trading agency, which conciliates rather than determines, and then the state civil and administrative tribunal.
Government decisions: the Commonwealth Ombudsman for federal agencies, the state ombudsman for state agencies, and the Administrative Review Tribunal for reviewable federal decisions.
Airlines have the Airline Customer Advocate for participating carriers, and private health insurers have the Private Health Insurance Ombudsman.
Step three: lodge, and what happens next
Lodging is online in every scheme and takes fifteen to thirty minutes. You will be asked for the business name, what happened, what you have already done, and what outcome you want.
The scheme first checks that you complained to the business and gave it a reasonable chance to respond. This is why the reference number matters.
Most schemes then refer the matter back to the business's own high-level complaints team with a short window to resolve it directly. A substantial proportion of cases settle at this stage, which is exactly the effect the case fee is designed to produce.
If it does not settle, the scheme investigates, seeks documents from both sides, and may reach a determination. Determinations bind the business up to monetary limits set by the scheme. They do not bind you: if you reject the outcome, you retain your right to go to court or a tribunal.
Timeframes vary from a few weeks for simple matters to several months for complex ones. You do not need a lawyer, and in most schemes you cannot recover legal costs, which is a strong argument for not engaging one.
When there is no ombudsman
For a straightforward consumer purchase where no industry scheme applies, the route is fair trading conciliation and then the state civil and administrative tribunal. Filing fees are low, procedure is informal, and legal representation often requires permission.
If you paid by card, a chargeback is a parallel route that operates through card scheme rules rather than through consumer law. It has its own time limits, generally counted from the transaction date or the date goods were due, so it is worth starting early rather than as a last resort.
For systemic conduct rather than your individual case, report to the relevant regulator: the ACCC for consumer law and competition, ASIC for financial services conduct, the ACMA for telecommunications and spam, and the OAIC for privacy breaches. None of these will resolve your dispute, but they act on patterns.
For a service that has gone badly wrong and caused loss beyond the price paid — a botched repair that damaged something else, for example — the claim may exceed the tribunal's consumer jurisdiction, and free advice from a community legal centre is worth getting before choosing a route.
Key takeaways
- Complain to the business in writing first and get a reference number — every ombudsman requires it before accepting a case.
- Name the specific ombudsman and a deadline in your complaint; it signals the case fee is coming and frequently resolves matters.
- Ombudsman schemes are free to you, cost the business a case fee, and their determinations bind the business but not you.
- AFCA covers financial services, the TIO covers telecommunications, state schemes cover energy and water, and fair trading covers general retail.
- You do not need a lawyer, and in most schemes you cannot recover legal costs — which is a strong reason not to hire one.
Who to contact
Australian Financial Complaints Authority
Banks, insurers, super funds, lenders, brokers and advisers. Free, binding on the firm.
Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman
Mobile, internet, landline — billing, faults, contracts and connections.
Complaints about Australian Government agencies and their administrative conduct.
Your state fair-trading agency
General consumer complaints — NSW Fair Trading 13 32 20, Consumer Affairs Victoria 1300 55 81 81, Queensland 13 74 68.
At a glance
- Cost to you
- A$0Every industry ombudsman scheme is free to consumers
- Binding on
- The business onlyYou can reject a determination and still go to court
- Required first step
- Complain to the businessAnd get a reference number
- Typical internal deadline
- 30 daysVaries by sector; financial firms have specific timeframes
- Financial services
- AFCA — 1800 931 678
- Telecommunications
- TIO — 1800 062 058
How to make a complaint that actually works — FAQ
How do I complain about a company in Australia?
Complain to the business in writing first, stating what happened, what you want and a deadline, and get a complaint reference number. If it is not resolved, escalate free of charge to the relevant industry ombudsman — AFCA for financial services, the TIO for telecommunications, your state energy and water ombudsman, or your state fair-trading agency.
Is an ombudsman complaint free?
Yes, for consumers. External dispute resolution schemes are funded by the businesses that are members, which pay a case fee when a complaint is lodged against them. That asymmetry is precisely why lodging one is effective — it costs you nothing and costs the business regardless of outcome.
Is an ombudsman decision binding?
It binds the business, up to the monetary limits set by the scheme, if you accept it. It does not bind you. If you reject the determination you keep your right to pursue the matter in a court or tribunal, so lodging costs you nothing in legal terms.
Do I need a lawyer to complain to an ombudsman?
No. These schemes are designed for unrepresented consumers, forms are plain-language, and investigators gather evidence themselves. In most schemes you cannot recover legal costs even if you succeed, so engaging a lawyer generally reduces your net outcome rather than improving it.
What if my complaint is about a government agency?
Complain to the agency first, then to the Commonwealth Ombudsman for federal agencies or your state ombudsman for state agencies. If the decision is a reviewable one — Centrelink, veterans' entitlements, migration, NDIS — the Administrative Review Tribunal conducts merits review, which is a stronger remedy than a complaint.
Read next
Sources & provenance
Facts verified
- 1.Make a complaint RegulatorAustralian Financial Complaints AuthorityUsed for: Scope, the requirement to complain to the firm first, and the binding nature of determinations
- 2.Making a complaint RegulatorTelecommunications Industry OmbudsmanUsed for: Telecommunications complaint pathway and referral back to the provider
- 3.Problem with a product or service RegulatorAustralian Competition and Consumer CommissionUsed for: Escalation path and the ACCC's role in systemic rather than individual matters
- 4.Other helpful agencies RegulatorACCCUsed for: Directory of state fair-trading agencies and industry ombudsman schemes
- 5.Complaints about Australian Government agencies RegulatorCommonwealth OmbudsmanUsed for: Federal agency complaint jurisdiction
- 6.Administrative Review Tribunal RegulatorAdministrative Review TribunalUsed for: Merits review of reviewable federal decisions
Not a source — AI-assisted analysis on this page
- AI-assisted analysis — the escalation sentence and the case-fee incentive — The recommended wording naming a specific ombudsman and deadline, and the explanation that case fees create the incentive that makes escalation effective, are our analysis of how these schemes operate. Neither is a technique recommended by any ombudsman scheme, and outcomes will vary.
Scheme jurisdictions, the requirement to complain to the business first, the binding-on-the-business nature of determinations and the directory of agencies come from the AFCA, TIO, ACCC, Commonwealth Ombudsman and ART sources cited above. Monetary limits, internal response timeframes and scheme membership change — confirm with the specific scheme. One passage is marked as AI-assisted analysis. This is general information, not legal advice.
Facts on this page are taken from the sources listed above — Australian government departments, regulators, statutory bodies and official statistical releases. Comparisons, judgements and "which option suits whom" conclusions are AI-assisted analysis written over those sources; they are marked in the text and listed as an AI-analysis entry in the sources, not attributed to any authority. Rates, thresholds, fees and processing times change, often at the start of a financial year; figures are current as at the review date shown and should be confirmed with the responsible agency before you rely on them for money or legal decisions.